I don't want to launch now and see what version exactly, but I have the green 'up to date' dot and I think I saw it updating yesterday. As impossible as it seems, Lightroom runs better on my 2012 15' MBP(with 16gb RAM) on the whole than it does on my M1.īTW, I have the CC helper that keeps LR and PS up to date with the latest stable versions. Has anyone else seen anything like this? Most of the reports claim that 8gb is fine even for photo editing, but I'm just not seeing it. It's all memory related I know, and I see memory pressure spiking to 90% in some of the worst of these instances with a 'baseline' of about 60% with only LR open and just doing light editing. Maybe it was because Lightroom was running under Rosetta I quit it, and used Pixelmator Pro instead, which is fully compatible with Apple Silicon. Lightroom isn't very snappy in rendering images as I'm browsing.

The M1 Pro chip is more than twice the speed of the M1. Even LR open in the background will make Firefox bog down. How does the M1 pro compare to the M1 for Lightroom When converting a 42 megapixel image to super resolution (168 megapixels). NEFs, the system is unuseable for anything else. When I'm doing an import/DNG batch process from my D800 or D810. M1 La enorme historia en la informática a lo largo de estos últimos 12 meses fué la resolución de Apple de dar de comer sus PCs portátiles con chips M1 caseros en vez de una opción alternativa llevada a cabo por Intel.

In any case, I've been running into issues with my 8gb/512gb MBP basically grinding to a halt with Lightroom. Vimos por la parte interior de qué manera se concretan los nuevos MacBook Pro de 14 y 16 pulgadas. I'm regretting it and and I'm waiting to splurge on a maxed out 16' M2 or whatever. I know, I know, I know, I should have bought the 16gb.

Macbook pro m1 lightroom